9 Conclusions and the way ahead

Summary of the main recommendations

SUMMARY | of Main Recommendations

The Legacy of the Past and Reconciliation

  • An independent Legacy Commission should be established to deal with the legacy of the past by combining processes of reconciliation, justice and information recovery. It would have the overarching objective of promoting peace and stability in Northern Ireland.
  • A Reconciliation Forum should be established through which the Legacy Commission and the Commission for Victims and Survivors for Northern Ireland (CVSNI) would liaise to tackle certain society issues relating to the conflict.
  • The Legacy Commission should be given a bursary of £100m to tackle these society issues.

Victims and Survivors

  • The suffering of families from Northern Ireland and Great Britain should be recognised. The nearest relative of someone who died as a result of the conflict in and about Northern Ireland, from January 1966, should receive a one-off ex-gratia recognition payment of £12,000.
  • The CVSNI should take account of, and address in their work programme, the present and future needs and concerns of victims and survivors, devoting attention to provision of services, funding, healthcare needs and compensation.
  • The Reconciliation Forum would also have a mandate to promote the improvement of services for healthcare issues attributable to the conflict, such as trauma, suicide and addiction.

The Legacy Commission

  • The Chair of the Legacy Commission should be an International Commissioner, who would also have specific responsibility within the Commission for addressing society issues through the Reconciliation Forum, tackling sectarianism, promoting reconciliation and administering the bursary. There would be two other Commissioners.
  • The mandate of the Legacy Commission would consist of four strands of work:

- helping society towards a shared and reconciled future, through a processof engagement with community issues arising from the conflict;

- reviewing and investigating historical cases;

- conducting a process of information recovery;

- examining linked or thematic cases emerging from the conflict.

  • The Legacy Commission’s mandate would be for a fixed period of five years.
  • The Office of the First Minister and deputy First Minister (OFMDFM) should join the British and Irish Governments in implementing this initiative.

Society Issues

  • Society issues arising from the conflict which should be tackled include: addressing sectarianism; promoting remembering activities; working with young people; providing improved services for healthcare needs; ensuring an even spread of economic benefits; and helping those exiled from Northern Ireland during the conflict to return.
  • The Reconciliation Forum should help to address these issues by analysing activity undertaken; considering the need for further activity; giving advice to Government and others; advising on strategies and on the development and delivery of services; and deciding on priority areas of activity.
  • The Legacy Commission should act as a champion for these society issues.
  • The Legacy Commission should take the lead in ensuring that sectarianism continues to be addressed, including through setting the direction for the debate and by highlighting the contribution that all sectors of society can make.
  • The Legacy Commission should engage specifically with the Christian Churches in Northern Ireland to encourage them to review and rethink their contribution to a non-sectarian future in the light of their past, particularly in the area of education.
  • The guidance produced by the Quigley-Hamilton working group, to eliminate discrimination against those with conflict-related convictions, should be incorporated into statute and made applicable to the provision of goods, facilities and services as well as recruitment.

Processes of Justice and Information Recovery

  • A new independent Unit dealing with historical cases would be created within the Legacy Commission, which would continue to review and investigate historical cases, backed by police powers. This would constitute the second strand of the Commission’s work.
  • The new Review and Investigation Unit would take over the work of the Historical Enquiries Team and the Police Ombudsman’s Unit dealing with the historical cases. The need for these would fall away when the new Unit is established. The new Unit would build on the work they have done to date.
  • The process of recovering information of importance to relatives (information recovery) would be separated from the investigation procedure and be subject to a distinct process within the Legacy Commission under a separate Commissioner. This would constitute the third strand of the Commission’s work.
  • In the fourth strand of its work, the Legacy Commission would examine themes arising from the conflict which remain of public concern, such as specific areas of paramilitary activity, or alleged collusion. This thematic examination would take place without public hearings. This would facilitate more open and frank disclosure and avoid the constant publicity of present inquiry proceedings.
  • There would be no new public inquiries. The question whether to proceed with the promised Finucane Inquiry is a matter for the British Government but the issues raised by this case could be dealt with by the Legacy Commission.
  • The outstanding Inquests would remain with the Coroners Service. Criminal case reviews would continue to be pursued through the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
  • The Group is not proposing an amnesty but recommends that the Legacy Commission itself make recommendations on how a line might be drawnat the end of its five-year mandate so that Northern Ireland might best move to a shared future.

Remembering

  • The Legacy Commission should, through the Reconciliation Forum, support CVSNI in facilitating and encouraging the telling of stories, including by young people, about the impact of the conflict on individuals and communities; and the stories of intra-communal difference.
  • CVSNI should also be supported in developing the existing ways in which the conflict and its impact are remembered. This should include the development of educational projects; providing support and guidance for those facilitating remembering projects in line with certain criteria; and promoting the value of remembering across society as a means of achieving reconciliation.
  • Future Storytelling initiatives should be developed taking account of certain criteria.
  • Full support should be given by government, the private and voluntary sector, including the churches, to the continuation of the annual Day of Reflection, initiated by Healing Through Remembering, on 21st June each year. Consideration should be given to renaming the event a Day of Reflection and Reconciliation.
  • Each year, on or around the Day of Reflection and Reconciliation, the First Minister and deputy First Minister should together make a keynote address to the Northern Ireland Assembly and invited guests, reflecting on the past in a positive way and confirming their commitment to lead Northern Ireland society towards a shared and reconciled future.
  • The Reconciliation Forum should take the lead in implementing an initiative, at the end of the five year mandate of the Legacy Commission, whereby Northern Ireland, with the support of the two Governments and the Northern Ireland Assembly, should conduct a ceremony remembering the past and all those who suffered during the conflict.
  • The Group therefore recommends that the Commission should, at the end of its work, challenge the people of Northern Ireland, including political parties and whatever remnant or manifestation of paramilitary groups remain, to sign a declaration to the effect that they will never again kill or injure others on political grounds.
  • A shared memorial to remember the conflict in and about Northern Ireland should be kept under consideration by the Reconciliation Forum and criteria should be observed, in working towards a shared memorial conducive to reconciliation. The Legacy Commission should, at the end of its five year life span, make recommendations to Government in this regard.



RSS feed of comments 2 Responses to “Summary of the main recommendations”

  1. Dewi says:

    Maybe the recommendations on the Society issues stuff are a little all encompassing. Rather than:
    1) “addressing sectarianism”,
    2)”ensuring an even spread of economic benefits”,
    3)”engage…with. Churches to review and rethink their contribution to a non-sectarian future…..particularly in the area of education” How about:

    1) Establish and fund well a secular youth activities movement.
    2) I’m not sure such an observation is appropriate without a grat deal more elaboration.
    3) Instigate compulsory secular education for all pupils.

  2. Jonathan McCullough says:

    It is absolutely ridiculous, abhorrent and sickening that members of illegal paramilitary organisations should be seen in the same light as their victims.
    Surely the right way, going forward, is to say that this payment should only be made to families of those killed whilst not carrying out illegal activity. Therefore the family of a police officer , soldier or paramiltary member would not recieve recompense if that family member was committing an illegal act when killed. I have no problem with giving compensation to the family of someone killed if it later transpires that they were a member of an illegal organisation, however, if killed whilst committing a crime it is truly abhorrent that they should be viewed similarly to innocent victims of their crimes.

Your feedback